Caricaceae 29 claims

family · order Brassicales · 1 taxa · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

1 entries

Carica papayapapaya · also papaya trees29 claims · 13 papers

29 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in mungbean height, pod length and pod number under papaya intercropping.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: wete0
Interactor: papayaCarica papayae0other
Outcome: plant height, pod length, number of pods per plante0
Comparator: drye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Significant difference between the wet and dry seasons’ effect in terms of plant height, pod length, number of pods per plant and total yield of mungbean intercropped to papaya was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–540

Title

Papaya-mungbean intercropping: Effect of season and different row spacing on the growth and yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercrop to papaya (Carica papaya L.)

Philippine Journal of Crop Science; Pablito M. Magdalita; Noribelle A. Salibad; et al. Crop protection newsletter 2025. doi:10.63568/pjcs.v50i1.1406

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in total mungbean yield under papaya intercropping.
Intervention effect When spacings were assessed individually, seasons differed significantly only in mungbean height and pod number.
Intervention effect Different spacings produced no detected significant difference in mungbean growth and yield regardless of season.
Observation The multiple cropping index was 169.44% in wet and dry seasons.
Observation Intercropping indicated a 69% increase in land use.
Observation One metre row spacing gave the highest wet-season income.
Observation Half-metre row spacing gave the highest dry-season income.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in total mungbean yield under papaya intercropping.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: wete0
Interactor: papayaCarica papayae0other
Outcome: total yielde0
Comparator: drye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Significant difference between the wet and dry seasons’ effect in terms of plant height, pod length, number of pods per plant and total yield of mungbean intercropped to papaya was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–540

Title

Papaya-mungbean intercropping: Effect of season and different row spacing on the growth and yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercrop to papaya (Carica papaya L.)

Philippine Journal of Crop Science; Pablito M. Magdalita; Noribelle A. Salibad; et al. Crop protection newsletter 2025. doi:10.63568/pjcs.v50i1.1406

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in mungbean height, pod length and pod number under papaya intercropping.
Intervention effect When spacings were assessed individually, seasons differed significantly only in mungbean height and pod number.
Intervention effect Different spacings produced no detected significant difference in mungbean growth and yield regardless of season.
Observation The multiple cropping index was 169.44% in wet and dry seasons.
Observation Intercropping indicated a 69% increase in land use.
Observation One metre row spacing gave the highest wet-season income.
Observation Half-metre row spacing gave the highest dry-season income.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

When spacings were assessed individually, seasons differed significantly only in mungbean height and pod number.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: wete0
Interactor: papayaCarica papayae0other
Outcome: plant height and number of podse0
Qualifier: when the three-row spacing was assessed individuallye0
Comparator: drye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“when the three-row spacing was assessed individually, significant difference only on plant height and number of pods of mungbean intercropped to papaya was observed between the wet and dry seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–746

Title

Papaya-mungbean intercropping: Effect of season and different row spacing on the growth and yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercrop to papaya (Carica papaya L.)

Philippine Journal of Crop Science; Pablito M. Magdalita; Noribelle A. Salibad; et al. Crop protection newsletter 2025. doi:10.63568/pjcs.v50i1.1406

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in mungbean height, pod length and pod number under papaya intercropping.
Intervention effect Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in total mungbean yield under papaya intercropping.
Intervention effect Different spacings produced no detected significant difference in mungbean growth and yield regardless of season.
Observation The multiple cropping index was 169.44% in wet and dry seasons.
Observation Intercropping indicated a 69% increase in land use.
Observation One metre row spacing gave the highest wet-season income.
Observation Half-metre row spacing gave the highest dry-season income.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different spacings produced no detected significant difference in mungbean growth and yield regardless of season.

Taxon: mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment: different row spacinge0
Interactor: papayaCarica papayae0other
Outcome: growth and yielde0
Qualifier: regardless of seasone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“significant difference on the growth and yield of mungbean intercropped to papaya was not detected using different row spacing regardless of season”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–904

Title

Papaya-mungbean intercropping: Effect of season and different row spacing on the growth and yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercrop to papaya (Carica papaya L.)

Philippine Journal of Crop Science; Pablito M. Magdalita; Noribelle A. Salibad; et al. Crop protection newsletter 2025. doi:10.63568/pjcs.v50i1.1406

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in mungbean height, pod length and pod number under papaya intercropping.
Intervention effect Wet and dry seasons differed significantly in total mungbean yield under papaya intercropping.
Intervention effect When spacings were assessed individually, seasons differed significantly only in mungbean height and pod number.
Observation The multiple cropping index was 169.44% in wet and dry seasons.
Observation Intercropping indicated a 69% increase in land use.
Observation One metre row spacing gave the highest wet-season income.
Observation Half-metre row spacing gave the highest dry-season income.

Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PapDfV1 replication and movement may depend on host proteins in mature papaya or unknown co-infecting viruses.

Taxon: PapDfV1e0
Interactor: papayaCarica papayae0host
Outcome: replication and movemente0
Qualifier: may depend on host proteins expressed in mature papaya plants or be facilitated by co-infection with unknown papaya virusese0

Verbatim

e0
“Detection of PapDfV1 in total and double-stranded RNA from leaf tissue of a 2-year-old papaya plant indicates that its replication and movement may depend on host proteins expressed in mature papaya plants or be facilitated by co-infection with unknown papaya viruses.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1350

Title

Characterization of an unusual carlavirus-like RNA from papaya (Carica papaya) lacking essential genes

Milenka Vera; Raúl Cifuentes; Ronan Keener; et al. PLoS ONE 2025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329708

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation A novel carlavirus-like RNA named PapDfV1 was identified in papaya latex RNA.
Observation PapDfV1 has two open reading frames.
Observation PapDfV1 ORF 1 encodes a 211.1 kDa replicase.
Observation PapDfV1 replicase shares 96% sequence identity with ZhBV2.
Observation PapDfV1 ORF 2 is chimeric with regions homologous to two ZhBV2 ORFs.
Observation PapDfV1 has a 2.1 kb deletion spanning portions of TGB1 and NABP and all of TGB2, TGB3 and CP.
Observation Replicase phylogeny grouped PapDfV1 with ZhBV2 and three Chinese CPMMV isolates.
Observation Two Chinese CPMMV isolates share the reported terminal sequences.
Intervention effect Mechanical inoculation and agroinfiltration failed to establish PapDfV1 infection in papaya.
Intervention effect Mechanical inoculation and agroinfiltration failed to establish PapDfV1 infection in Nicotiana benthamiana.
Intervention effect Mechanical inoculation and agroinfiltration failed to establish PapDfV1 infection in common bean.
Intervention effect A ZhBV2 construct successfully infected soybean.
Intervention effect A ZhBV2 construct successfully infected common bean.
Intervention effect A ZhBV2 construct successfully infected N. occidentalis.
Observation PapDfV1 was detected in total and double-stranded RNA from leaves of a two-year-old papaya.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green beans treated with papaya water grew slowly.

Taxon: green beanse0
Treatment: papaya watere0
Interactor: papayaCarica papayae0other
Outcome: grew slowlye0
Direction: slowlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the green beans treated with papaya water and guava leaf water grew slowly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–696

Title

The Effect of Secondary Metabolism Content in Plant Leaves on Mung Bean Seed Germination

Mina Arinta Putri; Firman Ali Rahman; Muhammad Yul Fikry; et al. Ecobios Journal Of Environmental Science 2024. doi:10.71024/ecobios/2024/v1i1/11

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Green beans treated with well water grew very quickly.
Intervention effect Green beans treated with cassava leaf water grew quite well.
Intervention effect Green beans treated with guava leaf water grew slowly.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased irradiance.

Taxon: Conilon coffeee0
Treatment: intercropped system of Conilon coffee and papaya treese0
Interactor: papaya treesCarica papayae0other
Outcome: irradiancee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The intercropped system of Conilon coffee and papaya trees led to a decrease in both irradiance and temperature, and higher means of relative humidity during daytime in all the periods assessed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1091

Title

Microclimate and development of Coffea canephora intercropped with Carica papaya: measures to mitigate climate change

Evelyn Trevisan; Marcos Góes Oliveira; Gustavo Pereira Valani; et al. Bioscience Journal 2022. doi:10.14393/bj-v38n0a2022-57099

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Intercropping decreased daytime temperature.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased daytime relative humidity.
Intervention effect Papaya shade increased coffee leaf area.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect plagiotropic or orthotopic branch growth or node number.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect coffee etiolation.
Recommendation The authors propose coffee–papaya intercropping as a climate mitigation farming system.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased daytime temperature.

Taxon: Conilon coffeee0
Treatment: intercropped system of Conilon coffee and papaya treese0
Interactor: papaya treesCarica papayae0other
Outcome: temperaturee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The intercropped system of Conilon coffee and papaya trees led to a decrease in both irradiance and temperature, and higher means of relative humidity during daytime in all the periods assessed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1091

Title

Microclimate and development of Coffea canephora intercropped with Carica papaya: measures to mitigate climate change

Evelyn Trevisan; Marcos Góes Oliveira; Gustavo Pereira Valani; et al. Bioscience Journal 2022. doi:10.14393/bj-v38n0a2022-57099

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Intercropping decreased irradiance.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased daytime relative humidity.
Intervention effect Papaya shade increased coffee leaf area.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect plagiotropic or orthotopic branch growth or node number.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect coffee etiolation.
Recommendation The authors propose coffee–papaya intercropping as a climate mitigation farming system.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased daytime relative humidity.

Taxon: Conilon coffeee0
Treatment: intercropped system of Conilon coffee and papaya treese0
Interactor: papaya treesCarica papayae0other
Outcome: relative humiditye0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The intercropped system of Conilon coffee and papaya trees led to a decrease in both irradiance and temperature, and higher means of relative humidity during daytime in all the periods assessed”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1091

Title

Microclimate and development of Coffea canephora intercropped with Carica papaya: measures to mitigate climate change

Evelyn Trevisan; Marcos Góes Oliveira; Gustavo Pereira Valani; et al. Bioscience Journal 2022. doi:10.14393/bj-v38n0a2022-57099

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Intercropping decreased irradiance.
Intervention effect Intercropping decreased daytime temperature.
Intervention effect Papaya shade increased coffee leaf area.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect plagiotropic or orthotopic branch growth or node number.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect coffee etiolation.
Recommendation The authors propose coffee–papaya intercropping as a climate mitigation farming system.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papaya shade increased coffee leaf area.

Taxon: coffee plantsCoffeae0
Treatment: shadow provided by papaya treese0
Interactor: papaya treesCarica papayae0other
Outcome: leaf areae0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The shadow provided by papaya trees in the coffee plants contributed to a higher leaf area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1249

Title

Microclimate and development of Coffea canephora intercropped with Carica papaya: measures to mitigate climate change

Evelyn Trevisan; Marcos Góes Oliveira; Gustavo Pereira Valani; et al. Bioscience Journal 2022. doi:10.14393/bj-v38n0a2022-57099

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Intercropping decreased irradiance.
Intervention effect Intercropping decreased daytime temperature.
Intervention effect Intercropping increased daytime relative humidity.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect plagiotropic or orthotopic branch growth or node number.
Intervention effect Papaya shade did not affect coffee etiolation.
Recommendation The authors propose coffee–papaya intercropping as a climate mitigation farming system.