Tectariaceae 67 claims

family · order Polypodiales · 17 taxa · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

17 entries

Tectaria paradoxa14 claims · 2 papers Tectariaalso Ctenitopsis · also Quercifilix13 claims · 8 papers Tectaria coadunata10 claims · 4 papers Arthropteris9 claims · 1 paper Tectaria dissecta6 claims · 1 paper Heterogonium2 claims · 1 paper Tectaria cicutariaalso T. cicutaria Copeland · also T. dilacerata Maxon2 claims · 1 paper Tectaria membranaceaalso A. membranaceum · also Tectaria devexa2 claims · 1 paper Arthropteris beckleri1 claim · 1 paper Tectaria decurrens1 claim · 1 paper Tectaria kehdingiana1 claim · 1 paper Tectaria palmata1 claim · 1 paper Tectaria pubens1 claim · 1 paper Tectaria singaporiana1 claim · 1 paper Tectariaceae1 claim · 1 paper Triplophyllum1 claim · 1 paper Triplophyllum heudelotii1 claim · 1 paper

67 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hance validly published the species name in 1872, but it was superfluous and illegitimate.

Taxon: A. membranaceumTectaria membranaceae0
Outcome: superfluous and illegitimatee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“The species name was eventually validly published by Hance (in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 142. 1872) but as he cited A. membranaceum as a synonym his name is superfluous and illegitimate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3443–3626

Title

(2893) Proposal to conserve the name Aspidium devexum (Tectaria devexa) against A. membranaceum (Tectariaceae)

Shi‐Yong Dong Taxon 2022. doi:10.1002/tax.12746

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Aspidium devexum was not validly published by Mettenius in 1864.
Observation The name Tectaria devexa has been widely used since 1907.
Recommendation The authors propose conserving Aspidium devexum against A. membranaceum.

Observationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The name Tectaria devexa has been widely used since 1907.

Taxon: Tectaria devexaTectaria membranaceae0
Outcome: widely used since 1907e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Tectaria devexa has been widely used since 1907 across the distribution range of the species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4715–4807

Title

(2893) Proposal to conserve the name Aspidium devexum (Tectaria devexa) against A. membranaceum (Tectariaceae)

Shi‐Yong Dong Taxon 2022. doi:10.1002/tax.12746

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observation Aspidium devexum was not validly published by Mettenius in 1864.
Observation Hance validly published the species name in 1872, but it was superfluous and illegitimate.
Recommendation The authors propose conserving Aspidium devexum against A. membranaceum.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tectaria coadunata was successfully propagated from spores in coco-peat and soil mixture.

Taxon: Tectaria coadunataTectaria coadunatae0
Treatment: coco-peat and soil mixturee0
Outcome: successful propagation of Tectaria coadunata from sporese0

Verbatim

e0
“We carried out the successful propagation of Tectaria coadunata from spores using two propagating media: coco-peat and soil mixture (soil, sand and compost manure).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–508

Title

Propagation of Tectaria coadunata (Wall. ex Hook. & Grev.) C.Chr by Spores

Chandrakala Thakur; Raghu Ram Parajuli; Prativa Budhathoki; et al. Journal of Plant Resources 2022. doi:10.3126/bdpr.v20i01.56600

Other claims from this paper (1)

Observation The propagation worked in a laboratory under controlled light and moisture.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The propagation worked in a laboratory under controlled light and moisture.

Taxon: Tectaria coadunataTectaria coadunatat0
Outcome: successful in laboratorye0
Qualifier: control condition of certain factors like light and moisturee0
Setting: laboratorye0

Verbatim

e0
“the work is successful in laboratory under control condition of certain factors like light and moisture”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–969

t0
“Tectaria coadunata”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33

Title

Propagation of Tectaria coadunata (Wall. ex Hook. & Grev.) C.Chr by Spores

Chandrakala Thakur; Raghu Ram Parajuli; Prativa Budhathoki; et al. Journal of Plant Resources 2022. doi:10.3126/bdpr.v20i01.56600

Other claims from this paper (1)

Observation Tectaria coadunata was successfully propagated from spores in coco-peat and soil mixture.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Athyrium, Christella and Tectaria were more common in the study area.

Taxon: Athyrium, Christella and TectariaTectariaAthyriumChristellae0
Outcome: more commone0

Verbatim

e0
“Selaginella, Pityrogramma, Pteris, Athyrium, Christella and Tectaria are more common in the study area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–533

Title

CRYPTOGAM DIVERSITY AND ECONOMIC UTILITY OF NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM, KERALA

AMNU SHAJI; S AMALA DIVYA YMER Digital 2022. doi:10.37896/ymer21.05/g2

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation The survey recorded 22 pteridophyte species from 14 families in Nilambur.
Observation Selaginellaceae, Pteridaceae and Thelypteridaceae were common families in the area.
Observation Selaginellaceae comprised three species.
Observation Pteridaceae comprised five species.
Observation Thelypteridaceae comprised two species.
Observation Selaginella, Pteris and Christella were dominant genera.
Observation Selaginella, Pityrogramma and Pteris were more common in the study area.
Observation Alsophila gigantea, Adiantum philippense and Anisocampium cummingianum were rare in the area.
Observation Macrothelypteris torresiana, Bolbitis terminans and Drynaria quercifolia were rare in the area.
Observation Pteridophyte distribution varied among sites.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extracts of Tectaria paradoxa contained high phenolics, 351.43 ± 14.5 mg GAE/g.

Taxon: T. paradoxaTectaria paradoxae1
Outcome: amount of phenolicse1
Value: 351.43 ± 14.5 mg GAE/ge1
Qualifier: methanolic extractse1

Verbatim

e1
“methanolic extracts of T. paradoxa showed high amount of phenolics 351.43 ± 14.5 mg GAE/g, tannin 34.38 ± 1.02 mg GAE/g, flavonoids 1384.44 ± 50.92 mg QE/g, triterpenoids 130.5 ± 2.77 mg/g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–646

Title

Total phenolic, tannin, triterpenoid, flavonoid and sterol contents, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of Tectaria paradoxa (Fee.) Sledge

Manivannan V; Johnson M Toxicology Reports 2020. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.013

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extracts of Tectaria paradoxa contained tannin at 34.38 ± 1.02 mg GAE/g.

Taxon: T. paradoxaTectaria paradoxae1
Outcome: tannine1
Value: 34.38 ± 1.02 mg GAE/ge1
Qualifier: methanolic extractse1

Verbatim

e1
“methanolic extracts of T. paradoxa showed high amount of phenolics 351.43 ± 14.5 mg GAE/g, tannin 34.38 ± 1.02 mg GAE/g, flavonoids 1384.44 ± 50.92 mg QE/g, triterpenoids 130.5 ± 2.77 mg/g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–646

Title

Total phenolic, tannin, triterpenoid, flavonoid and sterol contents, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of Tectaria paradoxa (Fee.) Sledge

Manivannan V; Johnson M Toxicology Reports 2020. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.013

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extracts of Tectaria paradoxa contained flavonoids at 1384.44 ± 50.92 mg QE/g.

Taxon: T. paradoxaTectaria paradoxae1
Outcome: flavonoidse1
Value: 1384.44 ± 50.92 mg QE/ge1
Qualifier: methanolic extractse1

Verbatim

e1
“methanolic extracts of T. paradoxa showed high amount of phenolics 351.43 ± 14.5 mg GAE/g, tannin 34.38 ± 1.02 mg GAE/g, flavonoids 1384.44 ± 50.92 mg QE/g, triterpenoids 130.5 ± 2.77 mg/g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–646

Title

Total phenolic, tannin, triterpenoid, flavonoid and sterol contents, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of Tectaria paradoxa (Fee.) Sledge

Manivannan V; Johnson M Toxicology Reports 2020. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.013

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methanolic extracts of Tectaria paradoxa contained triterpenoids at 130.5 ± 2.77 mg/g.

Taxon: T. paradoxaTectaria paradoxae1
Outcome: triterpenoidse1
Value: 130.5 ± 2.77 mg/ge1
Qualifier: methanolic extractse1

Verbatim

e1
“methanolic extracts of T. paradoxa showed high amount of phenolics 351.43 ± 14.5 mg GAE/g, tannin 34.38 ± 1.02 mg GAE/g, flavonoids 1384.44 ± 50.92 mg QE/g, triterpenoids 130.5 ± 2.77 mg/g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–646

Title

Total phenolic, tannin, triterpenoid, flavonoid and sterol contents, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of Tectaria paradoxa (Fee.) Sledge

Manivannan V; Johnson M Toxicology Reports 2020. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.013

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extracts of Tectaria paradoxa contained the maximum sterols, 3.2 ± 0.2 mg/g.

Taxon: T. paradoxaTectaria paradoxae2
Outcome: amount of sterolse2
Value: 3.2 ± 0.2 mg/ge2
Qualifier: acetone extractse2

Verbatim

e2
“acetone extracts of T. paradoxa displayed maximum amount of sterols 3.2 ± 0.2 mg/g”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–733

Title

Total phenolic, tannin, triterpenoid, flavonoid and sterol contents, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of Tectaria paradoxa (Fee.) Sledge

Manivannan V; Johnson M Toxicology Reports 2020. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.10.013

Other claims from this paper (12)