Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Severe deficit irrigation at 50% of ETc reduced fruit weight and crop production every year.

A claim from Response of Orange Trees to Deficit Irrigation Strategies: Effects on Plant Nutrition, Yield, and Fruit Quality · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe deficit irrigation at 50% of ETc reduced fruit weight and crop production every year.

Taxon
Citrus sinensisCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
Severe water restrictions (DI=50% ETc)e4
Outcome
fruit weight and crop productione4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
irrigation at the full rate of ETce2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“orange trees [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–367
e2

“Two different DI strategies supplying 70 and 50% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) were compared with irrigation at the full rate of ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–537
e4

“Severe water restrictions (DI=50% ETc) reduced fruit weight and crop production every year, with water-use efficiency values similar to those of the moderate DI (70% ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1134

Title

Response of Orange Trees to Deficit Irrigation Strategies: Effects on Plant Nutrition, Yield, and Fruit Quality

Fiorella Stagno; Francesco Intrigliolo; Simona Consoli; et al. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 2015. doi:10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000903

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-00ba4bfeda76fc7ccf85ff845d735c3ee5f092d2e926b0cc8654f46d7c02e3f3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 20 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.