Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Acid plus 10 and 100 ppm 6-BA gave significant field emergence improvements in sugarbeet.

A claim from Improvement of Sugarbeet Seed Emergence with Dilute Acid and Growth Regulator Treatments · 1981

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid plus 10 and 100 ppm 6-BA gave significant field emergence improvements in sugarbeet.

Treatment
acid + 10 and 100 ppm 6‐BAe6
Outcome
field emergencee6
Direction
improvementse6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poor emergence of sugarbeet seedling under moisture, temperature, and impedance stress conditions can limit satisfactory stand establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–140
e6

“Significant improvements in field emergence were also obtained with acid + 10 ppm GA 3 , acid + 10 and 100 ppm kinetin, acid + 10 and 100 ppm 6‐BA, and acid + 100% propylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1744

Title

Improvement of Sugarbeet Seed Emergence with Dilute Acid and Growth Regulator Treatments

W.R. Akeson; A.H. Freytag; M.A. Henson Crop Science 1981. doi:10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183x002100020025x

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-0245c445f9dbc01a3b65b35cec271ca3331d18f9617acda588a672011426a89b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

N-benzyladenine · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.