Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Very late sowing reduced total N, P and K uptake of wheat.

A claim from Effect of zinc application on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties under different sowing conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very late sowing reduced total N, P and K uptake of wheat.

Treatment
Very late sowinge0
Outcome
total N, P, Ke0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
normale4
Setting
Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhie6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Very late sowing reduced the yield attributes, grain and straw yields (9.2 and 29.1%), total N, P, K, Zn uptake, net returns (22.9%) and benefit: cost ratio (23.3%) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–869
e4

“sowing times (normal and very late)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–420
e6

“A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 201314 and 201415 at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136

Title

Effect of zinc application on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties under different sowing conditions

AMIT KUMAR; SHIVA DHAR ANCHAL DASS; RAMESH K. SINGH Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i3.4372

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-026f048c8babc41a334f8f88764973cf0442f9da5149549425010e6d437af6de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

sowing time · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.