Claim · model-written summary
IPM decreased fruit yield overall.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- IPM adoptione1
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield decreased overall”
e1“IPM adoption increases the performance of natural enemies”
t0“for apple depend on pest type”
Title
The benefits of integrated pest management for apple depend on pest type and production metrics
James M. W. Ryalls; Michael P. D. Garratt; Davide Spadaro; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2024. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1321067
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect IPM increased natural enemy performance.
- Intervention effect IPM reduced overall pest pressure.
- Intervention effect IPM reduced overall disease pressure.
- Association Disease pressure increased with adoption of multiple IPM facets.
- Intervention effect IPM did not limit apple quality.
- Intervention effect Predator natural enemies responded positively to IPM.
- Intervention effect Parasitoid natural enemies responded positively to IPM.
- Intervention effect Tissue-chewing herbivores decreased under IPM.
- Intervention effect Sap-sucking herbivores decreased under IPM.
- Recommendation The authors call for economic risk assessment of IPM outcomes.