Intervention effectmodel-written summary

With cotyledons removed and 4 W m −2 growth, higher sucrose concentration increased roots per cutting.

A claim from Influence of Cotyledon Excision and Sucrose on Root Formation in Pea Cuttings · 1976

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With cotyledons removed and 4 W m −2 growth, higher sucrose concentration increased roots per cutting.

Treatment
increasing concentrations of sucrosee0
Outcome
number of roots per cuttinge0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
4 W m −2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the number of roots per cutting was obtained at increasing concentrations of sucrose when the stock plants had been grown at 4 W m −2 and their cotyledons had been removed two days before the cuttings were excised.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–484
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–68

Title

Influence of Cotyledon Excision and Sucrose on Root Formation in Pea Cuttings

BJARKE VEIERSKOV; JÜRGEN HANSEN; ARNE SKYTT ANDERSEN Physiologia Plantarum 1976. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1976.tb03917.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-0724de266f81539685614d1614bc913b898514e92d36df06da31e6ce7c5f49c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sucrose · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.