Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium borate nanoparticle priming and misting enhanced seed germination relative to bulk counterparts.

A claim from Synthesis of nano calcium borate using sugarcane bagasse extract as a capping agent and its potential to promote germination in cowpea seeds · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium borate nanoparticle priming and misting enhanced seed germination relative to bulk counterparts.

Taxon
cowpea seedsVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
Priming cowpea seeds and misting them with synthesized calcium borate nanoparticlee0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
bulk counterpartse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Priming cowpea seeds and misting them with synthesized calcium borate nanoparticle proved to be effective, resulting in enhanced seed germination, increased root length, and an improved vigour index compared to using bulk counterparts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1153

Title

Synthesis of nano calcium borate using sugarcane bagasse extract as a capping agent and its potential to promote germination in cowpea seeds

John K. Smitha; Srilakshmi P. Bhaskar; Anagha Jose; et al. Results in Chemistry 2024. doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101722

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-08beff5ea5df7f94619ada9572f3ce7164d252c96d61627e2fe8eaa87dd306e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.