Intervention effectmodel-written summary

First irrigation significantly increased root-development parameters (length, volume and diameter).

A claim from Root characteristics and performance of different wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes under restricted irrigations in alluvial soil · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First irrigation significantly increased root-development parameters (length, volume and diameter).

Treatment
first irrigatione0
Outcome
root-development parameters (length, volume and diameter)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase was observed in chlorophyll content index, root-development parameters (length, volume and diameter), yield attributes and grain yield in all the varieties with first irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–648
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55

Title

Root characteristics and performance of different wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes under restricted irrigations in alluvial soil

NARENDRA SINGH GURJAR; S.K. VERMA; S.P.S. TOMAR Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i2.4552

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-0966a7fefc7c3b520fd6da7bbc4fff5f3de99df07f40d4c464e8b1bbcb0ba539 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.