Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher nitrogen levels increased wheat grain and straw yield and total N uptake.

A claim from Influence of Sub-surface Compaction on Recovery and Use Efficiency of Nitrogen in Wheat Crop on Highly Permeable Soils · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen levels increased wheat grain and straw yield and total N uptake.

Treatment
higher levels of irrigation and nitrogene0
Outcome
grain and straw yield and total N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain and straw yield and total N uptake increased due to sub-surface compaction (8 passings) and higher levels of irrigation and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–919
e1

“wheat grown on highly permeable loamy sand soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–196

Title

Influence of Sub-surface Compaction on Recovery and Use Efficiency of Nitrogen in Wheat Crop on Highly Permeable Soils

B. L. Yadav; K. K. Vyas Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2006

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-098bfefcc2aa2b91109aadfcbf4ae01f8cb59e37aad0a564077fb63e3fc219d0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.