Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Both herbicides gave greater control of six-leaf than 10-leaf itchgrass.

A claim from Influence of Adjuvants on Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron1 · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both herbicides gave greater control of six-leaf than 10-leaf itchgrass.

Organ / stage
six-leaf itchgrasse0
Treatment
both herbicidese0
Interactor
itchgrasse0weed
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
10-leafe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control with both herbicides was greater when applied to six-leaf itchgrass than to 10-leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–254
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81

Title

Influence of Adjuvants on Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron1

RONALD E. STRAHAN; JAMES L. GRIFFIN; DAVID L. JORDAN; et al. Weed Technology 2000. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2000)014[0066:ioaoir]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-0b6908da19a3c2a2d20e2c14dd01a2dc4d4a111440f553e7b9bbd10fbaa86d5e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.