Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium applied with 30cmx10cm spacing significantly increased chickpea seed yield (3.44 t/ha).

A claim from Effect of Spacing and Biofertilizers on Growth and Yield of Chickpea · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium applied with 30cmx10cm spacing significantly increased chickpea seed yield (3.44 t/ha).

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
application of Rhizobium (20 g/kg seeds) along with the Spacing 30cmx10cme1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.44 t/hae1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–68
e0

“The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2022-23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54
e1

“application of Rhizobium (20 g/kg seeds) along with the Spacing 30cmx10cm significantly increased the growth parameters viz. plant height (46.79 cm), number of nodules (31.93/plant), plant dry weight (22.11 g/plant) and yield parameters viz. number of pods per plant (36.80), seed index (22.15 g), seed yield (3.44 t/ha) and stover yield (4.28 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1210

Title

Effect of Spacing and Biofertilizers on Growth and Yield of Chickpea

Akash Singh; C. Umesha; V. Uday Kiran International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102720

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-0f9a57c383a8229907868204622ffb76bfb5f186f4cb8bb399ec559c16efd1b7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    The combined treatments significantly increased chickpea grain and straw yield.

    Effect of phosphorus, Sulphur and biofertilizers on growth attributes and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2018 · compared with control /un-inoculated

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and PSB inoculation significantly enhanced chickpea growth, yield attributes, yield.

    Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in North Western Rajasthan, India. · 2013

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    T9 recorded 34.29 pods per plant.

    Effects of Biofertilizer and Phosphorus on Growth, Yield Components and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2022

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly change crop biomass, grain yield or harvest index of chickpea compared with the non-inoculated control.

    Growth and yield response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation: productivity in relation to interception of radiation · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Rhizobium and 10 ppm GA3 treatments gave an almost negative response in yield parameters, with a few exceptions.

    Growth, yield and biochemical responses of BARI chhola-9 (Cicer arietinum L.) to GA3 and rhizobium application · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased pod number versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

density · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 64 positive, 7 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Wider row spacing did not increase weed-caused chickpea yield loss.

    The effect of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of chickpea · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Seeding rates had no significant effect on chickpea yield.

    Optimal sowing time and seeding rate for winter-sown, rain-fed chickpea in a cool, semi-arid Mediterranean area · 2005

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Plant density did not significantly affect chickpea yield.

    Comparison Winter and Spring Sowing Dates and Effect of Plant Density on Yield, Yield Components and Some Quality, Morphological Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Under Environmental Condition of Urmia, Iran · 2007

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Increasing plant density beyond 110,000 plants per hectare caused a decline in the rate of increase in harvest index of chickpea.

    Production potential of desi chickpea grown under various nitrogen and planting densities at Naivasha. · 2007

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Seed rates of 40, 50 and 60 kg/ha did not significantly influence vegetable-grain yield.

    Irrigation, seed rate and phosphorus management in vegetable grain chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Higher density reduced dry matter accumulation per plant.

    Effect of planting density on growth characters,yield and quality of chickpea(Cicer arietinum L.) · 2008

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Increasing seeding rate from 0.3 to 1.0 million units/ha reduced seeds per plant by 7–11.

    The effect of cultivation technologies on chickpea productivity in the southern part of the Rostov region · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Increased plant population improved crop yields in 60% of years

    Managing production constraints to the reliability of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) within marginal areas of the northern grains region of Australia · 2007

    Same direction

62 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.