Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P3 with soil-mixed Zn gave the highest grain weight per spike.

A claim from IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ZINC APPLICATION METHODS AND PHOSPHORUS DOSES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND GRAIN ZINC CONTENTS OF WHEAT · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 with soil-mixed Zn gave the highest grain weight per spike.

Treatment
P3 where Zn was applied as soil mixe0
Outcome
grain weight per spikee0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1.89ge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain weight per spike (1.89g), no. of tillers (691.01), grain yield (4.09 t ha-1), biological yield (11.01 t ha-1), harvest index (36.54%) and NDVI (0.42 were observed in P3 where Zn was applied as soil mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1812
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115

Title

IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ZINC APPLICATION METHODS AND PHOSPHORUS DOSES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND GRAIN ZINC CONTENTS OF WHEAT

MA SHAHBAZ; M ZAFAR; S AZIZ; et al. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal 2024. doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1217

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-0fe66f6f64f157eea6044a1dfc8a933af63bdeb5b3d0e39c9299514c14827db0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.