Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P3 with foliar Zn gave maximum spike length, 14.25.

A claim from IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ZINC APPLICATION METHODS AND PHOSPHORUS DOSES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND GRAIN ZINC CONTENTS OF WHEAT · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 with foliar Zn gave maximum spike length, 14.25.

Treatment
P3 as a result of foliar application of Zne0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
14.25e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum spike length (14.25), spikelets per spike (17.67), and Zn concentration were observed in P3 as a result of foliar application of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1595
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115

Title

IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ZINC APPLICATION METHODS AND PHOSPHORUS DOSES ON GROWTH, YIELD AND GRAIN ZINC CONTENTS OF WHEAT

MA SHAHBAZ; M ZAFAR; S AZIZ; et al. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal 2024. doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1217

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-69f2cb2a850a42187d6f53e91ae39b5c48ee986dd705e77ee42e432c8ca03c6c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil Zn application did not significantly affect wheat grain yield.

    Relevance for food sciences of quantitative spatially resolved element profile investigations in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Zn-EDTA gave the opposite grain yield result to ZnSO4.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021 · compared with ZnSO4

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Combined foliar zinc and pesticides had no adverse effect on grain yield or other nutrients.

    Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides · 2019

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield, straw yield or straw N.

    Influence of Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Grain Nitrogen in Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Boot-stage foliar N significantly reduced grain yield of hard red spring wheat by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Starting sprays eight weeks after emergence increased yield losses versus starting at emergence.

    Role of winter-active aphids spreading Barley yellow dwarf virus in decreasing wheat yields in a Mediterranean-type environment · 2005 · compared with regular applications started at emergence

    Opposite direction

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.