Claim · model-written summary
Alternative irrigation increased root length of intercropped faba bean by 24.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Taxon
- faba bean
Vicia fabae0 - Treatment
- alternative irrigatione0
- Outcome
- root lengthe2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 24.1 %e2
- Qualifier
- intercroppinge2
- Comparator
- conventional irrigation treatmente1
- Setting
- root box experimente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”
e1“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”
e2“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”
Title
Zhi Tao Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao 2011
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of mono-cropped wheat by 14.7 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased biomass of mono-cropped wheat by 2.9 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root weight of mono-cropped wheat by 6.4 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root length of mono-cropped wheat by 7.2 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of intercropped wheat by 21.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased biomass of intercropped wheat by 13.2 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root weight of intercropped wheat by 16.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root length of intercropped wheat by 16.0 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of mono-cropped faba bean by 4.2 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased biomass of mono-cropped faba bean by 1.8 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root weight of mono-cropped faba bean by 2.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root length of mono-cropped faba bean by 6.8 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of intercropped faba bean by 13.3 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased biomass of intercropped faba bean by 5.8 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Alternative irrigation increased root weight of intercropped faba bean by 5.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.
- Intervention effect Under alternative irrigation, intercropped wheat and faba bean yielded higher than the mono-cropped ones.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that integrating alternative irrigation into intercropping is feasible for wheat and faba bean.