Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under alternative irrigation, intercropped wheat and faba bean yielded higher than the mono-cropped ones.

A claim from Simulation experiment on yield and root response of intercropping wheat and faba bean to alternative irrigation · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under alternative irrigation, intercropped wheat and faba bean yielded higher than the mono-cropped ones.

Taxon
wheat and faba beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
alternative irrigatione3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
mono-cropping onese3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under alternative irrigation,the yield of intercropping wheat and faba bean was higher than that of the mono-cropping ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–920

Title

Simulation experiment on yield and root response of intercropping wheat and faba bean to alternative irrigation

Zhi Tao Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao 2011

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-faa9583b7fe7bfae23d589fe1e2ccf0e54bf2f8646b70e0d56f9864804d14063 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 49 positive, 13 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.