Paper · 2011 · Gansu Nongye Daxue xuebao

Simulation experiment on yield and root response of intercropping wheat and faba bean to alternative irrigation

Zhi Tao

18
claims
43
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems,in order to search evidence for integrating alternative irrigation into intercropping.Results showed that,compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively;and the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively.Under alternative irrigation,the yield of intercropping wheat and faba bean was higher than that of the mono-cropping ones,this confirmed that integrating alternative irrigation into intercropping system was feasible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of mono-cropped wheat by 14.7 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.7 %e1
Qualifier
mono-croppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased biomass of mono-cropped wheat by 2.9 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2.9 %e1
Qualifier
mono-croppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root weight of mono-cropped wheat by 6.4 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6.4 %e1
Qualifier
mono-croppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root length of mono-cropped wheat by 7.2 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.2 %e1
Qualifier
mono-croppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of intercropped wheat by 21.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.1 %e1
Qualifier
intercroppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased biomass of intercropped wheat by 13.2 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13.2 %e1
Qualifier
intercroppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root weight of intercropped wheat by 16.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.1 %e1
Qualifier
intercroppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root length of intercropped wheat by 16.0 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.0 %e1
Qualifier
intercroppinge1
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of mono-cropped faba bean by 4.2 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.2 %e2
Qualifier
mono-croppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased biomass of mono-cropped faba bean by 1.8 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
1.8 %e2
Qualifier
mono-croppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root weight of mono-cropped faba bean by 2.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root weighte2
Direction
increasede2
Value
2.1 %e2
Qualifier
mono-croppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root length of mono-cropped faba bean by 6.8 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
6.8 %e2
Qualifier
mono-croppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased seed yield of intercropped faba bean by 13.3 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
13.3 %e2
Qualifier
intercroppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased biomass of intercropped faba bean by 5.8 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
5.8 %e2
Qualifier
intercroppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root weight of intercropped faba bean by 5.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root weighte2
Direction
increasede2
Value
5.1 %e2
Qualifier
intercroppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative irrigation increased root length of intercropped faba bean by 24.1 % relative to conventional irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
alternative irrigatione0
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
24.1 %e2
Qualifier
intercroppinge2
Comparator
conventional irrigation treatmente1
Setting
root box experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to conventional irrigation treatment correspondingly,the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of mono-cropping wheat was increased by 14.7 %,2.9 %,6.4 %,7.2 % respectively,and that of the intercropping wheat was increased by 21.1 %,13.2 %,16.1 %,16.0 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“the seed yield,biomass,root weight,root length of alternative irrigated mono-cropping and intercropping faba bean was increased by 4.2 %,1.8 %,2.1 %,6.8 % and 13.3 %,5.8 %,5.1 %,24.1 % respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under alternative irrigation, intercropped wheat and faba bean yielded higher than the mono-cropped ones.

Taxon
wheat and faba beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
alternative irrigatione3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
mono-cropping onese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Under alternative irrigation,the yield of intercropping wheat and faba bean was higher than that of the mono-cropping ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–920 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that integrating alternative irrigation into intercropping is feasible for wheat and faba bean.

Taxon
wheat and faba beanVicia fabaTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
integrating alternative irrigation into intercropping systeme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In this study,a root box experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of alternative irrigation on the yield,root weight and length of wheat and faba bean in mono-cropping and intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e4

“this confirmed that integrating alternative irrigation into intercropping system was feasible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1014 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 16 positive, 17 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 49 positive, 13 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.