Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T3 produced maximum cob yield with husk of 14.63 t/ha.

A claim from Influence of Spacing and Zinc Application on Growth and Productivity of Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced maximum cob yield with husk of 14.63 t/ha.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
T3 with 40 X 20 cm spacing and 20 kg ha-1ZnSO4e0
Outcome
cob yield with huske0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.63 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum crop growth rate (30.45 g/m2/day), cob yield with husk (14.63 t/ha), cob yield without husk (5.09 t/ha) and green fodder yield (28.83 t/ha) was observed for T3 with 40 X 20 cm spacing and 20 kg ha-1ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1123
t0

“Baby Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–95

Title

Influence of Spacing and Zinc Application on Growth and Productivity of Baby Corn (Zea mays L.)

Gopathi Rohini; Vikram Singh; Shruti G. George; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1731044

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-1071de04ca3c70ab5b2137cd5651355db5d0206ddf178070939ae72973139de7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Zinc sulfate at 25 versus 35 kg ha -1 did not significantly alter maize grain yield.

    Production and Profitability of Maize as Influenced by Different Levels of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Zinc in Central Plateau Zone of Maharashtra · 2017

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Zinc sulfate doses produced no change in grain yield.

    FOLIAR FEEDING WITH ZINC AS A BIOFORTIFICATION STRATEGY IN MAIZE · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Foliar ZnSO 4 was less effective than soil applied Zn on the more calcareous soil.

    III. Response of sweet corn to sources of zinc · 1977 · compared with soil‐applied Zn

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    M1 plus S8 was on par with M1 plus S4.

    Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) at Different Planting Densities and N-Levels · 2017 · compared with M1 (1,00,000 plants ha-1) and S4 (300 kg N ha-1)

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Optimal zinc fertilizer increased summer maize grain yield.

    Effects of zinc fertilizer rate and application method on photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of summer maize · 2016

    Same direction

  6. positive
    ZnSO4 yielded the highest corn dry matter production.

    Influence of water solubility of granular zinc fertilizers on plant uptake and growth · 1999

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Sole and combined zinc and iron sulfate application improved maize yield attributes.

    Biofortification of maize with zinc and iron not only enhances crop growthbut also improves grain quality · 2021

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Foliar spray of ZnSO4 at the 9-leaf stage gave the maximum grain yield in maize hybrid Monsanto-6525.

    Exploring the Role of Zinc in Maize (Zea Mays L.) through Soil and Foliar Application · 2015

    Same direction

119 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Corn grain yield with 19-cm row spacing was 11% lower than with 38- and 76-cm row spacings.

    Corn and Soybean Response to Rotation Sequence, Row Spacing, and Tillage System · 2003 · compared with 38‐ and 76‐cm row spacings

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Shade reduced yield 66% at high density.

    Intensifying Plant Density Response of Corn with Artificial Shade · 1992 · compared with ambient light

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Variation in within-row spacing did not affect corn yield.

    Response of Corn Grain Yield to Spatial and Temporal Variability in Emergence · 2004

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Moderate plant-spacing variability did not change canopy-level maize grain yield.

    Effect of Crowding Stress on Dry Matter Accumulation and Harvest Index in Maize · 2006

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    High plant density decreases dry matter accumulation in maize internodes

    How High Plant Density of Maize Affects Basal Internode Development and Strength Formation · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Grain yields did not differ across planting densities.

    Response to Plant Densities and Nitrogen Levels for Four Maize Cultivars from Different Eras of Breeding1 · 1987

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Spacing variability did not significantly affect grain yield.

    Within‐Row Plant Spacing Variability Does Not Affect Corn Yield · 2004

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Density had no significant effect on harvest index.

    Yield and Quality of Forage Maize as Influenced by Hybrid, Planting Date, and Plant Density · 1991

    Opposite direction

649 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.