Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage (NT) gave a lower yield than FR in Chifeng and Tongliao.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the difficulty of increasing the yield of maize ( Zea mays L.) in Eastern Inner Mongolia”
e1“the yield of NT was less than that of FR in Chifeng and Tongliao”
Title
The effect of tillage methods on soil physical properties and maize yield in Eastern Inner Mongolia
Xiaofang Yu; Jiawei Qu; Shuping Hu; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2023. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2023.126852
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect SC, SS and DP gave lower bulk density than FR at each site.
- Intervention effect SC, SS and DP gave higher soil aeration porosity than FR at some soil depths.
- Intervention effect DP and SS at Tongliao and Xingan gave higher water contents than FR.
- Intervention effect No-tillage (NT) at Hulun Buir gave higher water content than FR.
- Association Favorable soil conditions promoted maize grain yield.
- Intervention effect SC increased maize yield by 4.3% in Chifeng.
- Intervention effect DP increased maize yield by 10.96% in Chifeng.
- Intervention effect SC increased maize yield by 15.93% relative to FR in Xingan.
- Intervention effect DP increased maize yield by 18.22% relative to FR in Xingan.
- Intervention effect SS and DP gave a higher yield than FR in Tongliao.
- Intervention effect The other tillage methods gave a higher yield than FR in Hulun Buir.
- Recommendation SC and DP are the optimal tillage practice for Chifeng and Xingan.
- Recommendation SS and DP are optimal tillage practices for Tongliao and Hulun Buir.