Claim · model-written summary
SS and DP gave a higher yield than FR in Tongliao.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the difficulty of increasing the yield of maize ( Zea mays L.) in Eastern Inner Mongolia”
e7“SS and DP resulted in a higher yield in Tongliao, and the other tillage methods had a higher yield in Hulun Buir compared with FR”
Title
The effect of tillage methods on soil physical properties and maize yield in Eastern Inner Mongolia
Xiaofang Yu; Jiawei Qu; Shuping Hu; et al. European Journal of Agronomy 2023. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2023.126852
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect SC, SS and DP gave lower bulk density than FR at each site.
- Intervention effect SC, SS and DP gave higher soil aeration porosity than FR at some soil depths.
- Intervention effect DP and SS at Tongliao and Xingan gave higher water contents than FR.
- Intervention effect No-tillage (NT) at Hulun Buir gave higher water content than FR.
- Association Favorable soil conditions promoted maize grain yield.
- Intervention effect SC increased maize yield by 4.3% in Chifeng.
- Intervention effect DP increased maize yield by 10.96% in Chifeng.
- Intervention effect SC increased maize yield by 15.93% relative to FR in Xingan.
- Intervention effect DP increased maize yield by 18.22% relative to FR in Xingan.
- Intervention effect The other tillage methods gave a higher yield than FR in Hulun Buir.
- Intervention effect No-tillage (NT) gave a lower yield than FR in Chifeng and Tongliao.
- Recommendation SC and DP are the optimal tillage practice for Chifeng and Xingan.
- Recommendation SS and DP are optimal tillage practices for Tongliao and Hulun Buir.