Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At low density, high N increased biological yield by 29.8% over low N.

A claim from Effects of Ridge-Mulching with Plastic Sheets for Rainwater-Harvesting Cultivation on WUE and Yield of Winter Wheat · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low density, high N increased biological yield by 29.8% over low N.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high N rate with low plant densitye0
Outcome
biological and grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
29.8e0
Comparator
low N rate with low plant densitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high N rate with low plant density was 29.8 and 29.1% higher in both biological and grain yields than that of the low N rate with low plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1553
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–115

Title

Effects of Ridge-Mulching with Plastic Sheets for Rainwater-Harvesting Cultivation on WUE and Yield of Winter Wheat

WANGCai-rong; TIANXiao-hong; LISheng-xiu 中国农业科学:英文版 2004

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-116dcd8d9719e893bfc680234abdaa9de1a6f932045d023c65add75fa50c629f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.