Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intensive calcium or iron elevated iron content of nickel-treated maize shoots.

A claim from Growth and Mineral Composition of Nickel-Stressed Plants Under Conditions of Supplementation With Excessive Amounts of Calcium and Iron · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive calcium or iron elevated iron content of nickel-treated maize shoots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Ca or Fee0
Outcome
Fe contente1
Direction
elevatede1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in shoots of Ni-treated maize plants intensively supplied with Ca or Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1072
e1

“significantly elevated Fe content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–913

Title

Growth and Mineral Composition of Nickel-Stressed Plants Under Conditions of Supplementation With Excessive Amounts of Calcium and Iron

Renata Matraszek; Barbara Hawrylak-Nowak Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 2010. doi:10.1080/15287394.2010.492015

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-165dde249c69e2becc3bffd58611dd427a7ae3b5c7bf3e70f02a4d3f7677e4c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 21 positive, 5 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 49 positive, 5 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
    ZmYS1 responded more to iron deficiency in shoots than roots.

    Mapping of the Quantitative Trait Loci and Candidate Genes Associated With Iron Efficiency in Maize · 2022 · compared with roots

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.