Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing paclobutrazol concentration from 30 to 240 mg l−1 minimally increased shoot growth suppression without Sunspray 67E.

A claim from The effect of paclobutrazol sprays with or without the addition of surfactants on the shoot growth, yield and fruit quality of the apple cultivars Cox and Suntan · 1986

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing paclobutrazol concentration from 30 to 240 mg l−1 minimally increased shoot growth suppression without Sunspray 67E.

Treatment
Increasing the concentration of paclobutrazol in these three sprayse0
Outcome
shoot growth suppressione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30 to 240 mg l−1e0
Qualifier
where no Sunspray 67E was includede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivars Cox and Suntan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–161
e0

“Increasing the concentration of paclobutrazol in these three sprays, from 30 to 240 mg l−1, produced only a minimal increase in the level of shoot growth suppression where no Sunspray 67E was included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–634

Title

The effect of paclobutrazol sprays with or without the addition of surfactants on the shoot growth, yield and fruit quality of the apple cultivars Cox and Suntan

P. J. Richardson; A. D. Webster; J. D. Quinlan Journal of Horticultural Science 1986. doi:10.1080/14620316.1986.11515724

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-1661ba0fdf94b2cfaed4cd8e63efcfbc74584e5f43985a85c7a604d6861c42a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

paclobutrazol · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.