Intervention effectmodel-written summary

With tap water and inoculation, Soronko and Nyira had the highest pod counts, pod fresh weight and pod dry weight.

A claim from Interaction effect of Bacillus subtilis co-inoculation and mine water irrigation on cowpea's growth, physiology and nutritional quality · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With tap water and inoculation, Soronko and Nyira had the highest pod counts, pod fresh weight and pod dry weight.

Material
Soronko and Nyirae0
Treatment
co-inoculated with B. subtilis (B+)e0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
plant pod counts, pod fresh weight, pod dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Asetenapa and controle0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 0% MW irrigation, Soronko and Nyira co-inoculated with B. subtilis (B+) had the highest nodule counts, plant pod counts, pod fresh weight, pod dry weight, number of seeds and seeds fresh weight per plant compared to Asetenapa and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1271
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90

Title

Interaction effect of Bacillus subtilis co-inoculation and mine water irrigation on cowpea's growth, physiology and nutritional quality

Thalukanyo Nevhulaudzi; Sheku Alfred Kanu; Khayalethu Ntushelo Scientific African 2020. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00541

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-17cd63cb28d2d04563a6947d14b2d033a56de48c710b74658306d0623320a0c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.