Claim · model-written summary
Managing the seasonal timing of trunk injection can reduce insecticide exposure risk for pollinators in apple.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- managing the seasonal timing of injectione7
- Interactor
- pollinatorse7pollinator
- Outcome
- risk of insecticide exposure to pollinatorse7
- Direction
- reducee7
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“trunk injection in apples”
e7“This study also shows that managing the seasonal timing of injection can reduce the risk of insecticide exposure to pollinators”
Title
Charles C Coslor; Christine Vandervoort; John C Wise Pest Management Science 2018. doi:10.1002/ps.5268
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Neonicotinoid trunk injection reduced Empoasca fabae density in apple trees in the field.
- Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole and abamectin trunk injection resulted in moderate to high mortality in apple trees.
- Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole and abamectin trunk injection reduced Choristoneura rosaceana feeding in bioassays.
- Intervention effect Imidacloprid trunk-injected in spring was not detected in apple nectar or pollen.
- Intervention effect Imidacloprid injected the previous fall was detected at 0.39 ng g −1 in apple pollen.
- Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate injected the previous fall was not detected in apple nectar or pollen.
- Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate injected in spring was detected at 7.36 ng g −1 in apple nectar.
- Intervention effect Emamectin benzoate injected in spring was detected at 1.15 ng g −1 in apple pollen.
- Observation The study identified a broader list of possible trunk‐injectable pesticides for apple trees.