Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertilization regimes showed no fruit-size difference from controls over three years.

A claim from EFFECTS OF NITROGEN RATE AND APPLICATION DATE ON GROWTH, YIELD, AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF NECTARINE LEAVES AND FRUIT · 1992

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization regimes showed no fruit-size difference from controls over three years.

Treatment
fertilizatione1
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data collected over the three trial years show no differences as compared to control in yield and fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–543
e1

“five fertilization regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–123
t0

“NECTARINE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–100

Title

EFFECTS OF NITROGEN RATE AND APPLICATION DATE ON GROWTH, YIELD, AND MINERAL COMPOSITION OF NECTARINE LEAVES AND FRUIT

B. Marangoni; D. Scudellari; M. Toselli HortScience 1992. doi:10.21273/hortsci.27.6.594g

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-1b516fdbcfb7614a486302f7fee230e65994002054f3f01a5e6e2b1eefb0adc8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.