Claim · model-written summary
IT82E-16 yielded more grain under monocropping and strip intercropping than mixed intercropping.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Material
- IT82E-16e0
- Treatment
- monocropping and strip intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- mixed intercroppinge0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cowpea varieties „IT86D-1010‟, „IT82E-16‟ and „IT87K-499-35‟ harvested more grain yield under monocropping and strip intercropping than under mixed intercropping”
Title
Joseph Nwafor Akanwe Asiwe; Katlego Alocia Maimela International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2020. doi:10.17957/ijab/15.1634
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Cowpea variety and cropping system interacted significantly for most measured variables.
- Intervention effect Strip-intercropped cowpea performed better than mixed-intercropped cowpea.
- Intervention effect IT86D-1010 yielded more grain under monocropping and strip intercropping than mixed intercropping.
- Intervention effect IT87K-499-35 yielded more grain under monocropping and strip intercropping than mixed intercropping.
- Observation Strip intercropping had an LER of 1.25 to 2.29 across seasons.
- Observation Mixed intercropping had an LER of 0.50 to 1.32.
- Intervention effect Strip intercropping had a higher LER than mixed intercropping.
- Observation The three named cowpea varieties grown with maize in strips yielded more profit under intercropping.
- Recommendation The authors recommended the three varieties in maize strip intercropping for low-rainfall Limpopo farms.
- Intervention effect Strip intercropping achieved threefold greater grain yield, LER and net profit than mixed intercropping.