Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 150 kg ha -1 seed rate gave the tallest plants, most tillers, longest spikes, most spikelets and grains, highest grain yield and harvest index.

A claim from Impact of different priming and sowing techniques in combination with different seed rates on wheat growth and yield · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 150 kg ha -1 seed rate gave the tallest plants, most tillers, longest spikes, most spikelets and grains, highest grain yield and harvest index.

Treatment
seed rate 150 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown with seed rate 150 kg ha -1 showed the tallest plants at 111.0 and 111.7 cm, maximum number of tillers (411.6 and 408.2 m -2 ), longest spikes (7.8 and 7.7 cm), maximum spikelets (34.3 and 34.3 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (50.8 and 47.2 spike -1 ), maximum grain yield (4.6 and 4.5 t ha -1 ) and maximum harvest index (38.4 and 36.7%) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2637
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99

Title

Impact of different priming and sowing techniques in combination with different seed rates on wheat growth and yield

Samiullah Khan Ranazai; Muhammad Sadiq; Muhammad Safdar Baloch; et al. Scientific Reports 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78256-y

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-1dc58f3cedeee3ab0eba9c17841146c87af69b1a63b314e0a787ae2ef2227735 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.