Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Impact of different priming and sowing techniques in combination with different seed rates on wheat growth and yield

Samiullah Khan Ranazai; Muhammad Sadiq; Muhammad Safdar Baloch; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is a staple crop of immense economic importance, especially in the agronomic context of Dera Ismail Khan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. Understanding the effects of various agronomic practices, such as priming techniques, sowing methods, and seed rates, on wheat yield and growth is crucial for optimizing production and ensuring regional food security. To study the effects of priming and sowing techniques in combination with seed rates on short (Israr Shaheed) and long (Gomal) duration, three experiments were conducted at the agronomic research site of Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan, wheat varieties. In the first experiment, various priming techniques were used. Among different techniques used Farmyard manure priming produced the tallest plants at 111.3 and 125.3 cm, the maximum number of tillers (335.7 and 345.0 m -2 ), longest spikes (8.6 and 7.6 cm), maximum spikelets (27.2 and 31.0 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (45.5 and 48.7 spike -1 ), maximum grain yield (4.4 and 4.6 t ha -1 ) and maximum harvest index (38.7 and 41.5%) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal. Conversely, compost manure produced heavier grains than other interactions (49.2 and 42.3 g) while sodium chloride showed the maximum biological yield (12.4 and 11.8 t ha -1 ) for Israr Shaheed and Gomal correspondingly. In 2nd experiment, different sowing methods were tested on two wheat varieties Israr Shaheed and Gomal. Dry sowing followed by flooding produced tallest plants measuring (105.5 and 101.7 cm), maximum number of tillers (398.2 and 406.7 m -2 ), longest spikes (8.3 and 7.2 cm), maximum spikelets (29.8 and 35.5 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (54.3 and 51.6 spike -1 ) and maximum grain yield (4.3 and 4.6 t ha -1 ) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal. Israr Shaheed and Gomal showed maximum 1000-grain weights (45.3 and 45.0 g) in sprouted seeding in flooded fields respectively. The highest biological yield (13.6 t ha-1) was in dry seed in the flooded field while the maximum harvest index (33.5 and 33.9%) was recorded in soaked seed followed by flooding for Israr Shaheed and Gomal. In the last experiment, different seed rates were studied. The results showed that plants grown with seed rate 150 kg ha -1 showed the tallest plants at 111.0 and 111.7 cm, maximum number of tillers (411.6 and 408.2 m -2 ), longest spikes (7.8 and 7.7 cm), maximum spikelets (34.3 and 34.3 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (50.8 and 47.2 spike -1 ), maximum grain yield (4.6 and 4.5 t ha -1 ) and maximum harvest index (38.4 and 36.7%) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal. The maximum number of 1000-grains weight (g) was found on 200 and 250 kg ha -1 for Israr Shaheed and Goma-8, respectively giving 45.2 g while biological yield was the highest in 175 kg ha -1 respectively. Conclusively, the results indicated that yield and yield attributes in wheat were enhanced up to 150 kg ha -1 seed rate when interacted with farmyard manure priming along with dry sowing of seed followed by flooding. Future research should explore the integration of advanced irrigation techniques and nutrient management practices to further enhance wheat productivity in the Dera Ismail Khan region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure priming gave the tallest plants, most tillers, longest spikes, most spikelets and grains, highest grain yield and harvest index in both varieties.

Material
Israr Shaheed and Gomale0
Treatment
Farmyard manure priminge0
Outcome
maximum grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Farmyard manure priming produced the tallest plants at 111.3 and 125.3 cm, the maximum number of tillers (335.7 and 345.0 m -2 ), longest spikes (8.6 and 7.6 cm), maximum spikelets (27.2 and 31.0 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (45.5 and 48.7 spike -1 ), maximum grain yield (4.4 and 4.6 t ha -1 ) and maximum harvest index (38.7 and 41.5%) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost manure produced heavier grains than other interactions.

Treatment
compost manuree0
Outcome
heavier grainse0
Direction
heaviere0
Comparator
other interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost manure produced heavier grains than other interactions (49.2 and 42.3 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium chloride gave maximum biological yield in both varieties.

Treatment
sodium chloridee0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium chloride showed the maximum biological yield (12.4 and 11.8 t ha -1 ) for Israr Shaheed and Gomal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry sowing followed by flooding gave maximum grain yield and several yield components in both varieties.

Treatment
Dry sowing followed by floodinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry sowing followed by flooding produced tallest plants measuring (105.5 and 101.7 cm), maximum number of tillers (398.2 and 406.7 m -2 ), longest spikes (8.3 and 7.2 cm), maximum spikelets (29.8 and 35.5 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (54.3 and 51.6 spike -1 ) and maximum grain yield (4.3 and 4.6 t ha -1 ) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1820 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprouted seeding in flooded fields gave maximum 1000-grain weights.

Treatment
sprouted seeding in flooded fieldse0
Outcome
1000-grain weightse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Israr Shaheed and Gomal showed maximum 1000-grain weights (45.3 and 45.0 g) in sprouted seeding in flooded fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1822–1935 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry seed in flooded field gave the highest biological yield.

Treatment
dry seed in the flooded fielde0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.6 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest biological yield (13.6 t ha-1) was in dry seed in the flooded field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1950–2029 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaked seed followed by flooding gave maximum harvest index.

Treatment
soaked seed followed by floodinge0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum harvest index (33.5 and 33.9%) was recorded in soaked seed followed by flooding for Israr Shaheed and Gomal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2155 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 150 kg ha -1 seed rate gave the tallest plants, most tillers, longest spikes, most spikelets and grains, highest grain yield and harvest index.

Treatment
seed rate 150 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown with seed rate 150 kg ha -1 showed the tallest plants at 111.0 and 111.7 cm, maximum number of tillers (411.6 and 408.2 m -2 ), longest spikes (7.8 and 7.7 cm), maximum spikelets (34.3 and 34.3 spike -1 ), maximum number of grains (50.8 and 47.2 spike -1 ), maximum grain yield (4.6 and 4.5 t ha -1 ) and maximum harvest index (38.4 and 36.7%) respectively for Israr Shaheed and Gomal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2637 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rates of 200 and 250 kg ha -1 gave maximum 1000-grain weight for Israr Shaheed and Goma-8 respectively.

Treatment
200 and 250 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
1000-grains weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
45.2 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of 1000-grains weight (g) was found on 200 and 250 kg ha -1 for Israr Shaheed and Goma-8, respectively giving 45.2 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2639–2774 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield was highest at a 175 kg ha -1 seed rate.

Treatment
175 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological yield was the highest in 175 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2781–2829 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that farmyard manure priming, dry sowing then flooding, and seed rate up to 150 kg ha -1 enhanced wheat yield attributes.

Outcome
yield and yield attributese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield attributes in wheat were enhanced up to 150 kg ha -1 seed rate when interacted with farmyard manure priming along with dry sowing of seed followed by flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2885–3059 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 9 positive, 19 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

flooding · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 17 positive, 85 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 84 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

301 papers: 270 positive, 31 negative or no effect

269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

297 papers more in this group

See all 301 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.