Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vegetative nutrient concentrations and uptake were generally at least 10% greater under conventional than no tillage in 2018.

A claim from Plant productivity and nutrient uptake as affected by tillage and site‐position in furrow‐irrigated rice · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative nutrient concentrations and uptake were generally at least 10% greater under conventional than no tillage in 2018.

Treatment
CTe1
Outcome
Vegetative tissue nutrient concentrations and uptakee1
Direction
greatere1
Value
at least 10%e1
Qualifier
drier growing season (2018)e1
Comparator
NTe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow‐irrigated rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49
e1

“Vegetative tissue nutrient concentrations and uptake were generally at least 10% greater ( P < .05) under CT than NT but did not substantially differ by site position during the drier growing season (2018).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1155

Title

Plant productivity and nutrient uptake as affected by tillage and site‐position in furrow‐irrigated rice

Diego Della Lunga; Kristofor R. Brye; Christopher G. Henry; et al. Agronomy Journal 2021. doi:10.1002/agj2.20640

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-1fe67f0d318d2a01c2a14a9a67d9f04738b5a25801b932e8186750322027767c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 98 positive, 10 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.