Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the first season, 40 cm tillage increased rice N uptake by 16–18 kg ha −1 relative to 15 or 25 cm.

A claim from Tillage Depth Influence on Soil Nitrogen Distribution and Availability in a Rice Lowland · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season, 40 cm tillage increased rice N uptake by 16–18 kg ha −1 relative to 15 or 25 cm.

Treatment
tillage to a depth of 40 cme0
Outcome
rice N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
16–18 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
15 or 25 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral N availability in the 0‐ to 45‐cm profile and rice N uptake in the first season were significantly higher (20–25 kg ha −1 higher mineral N and 16–18 kg ha −1 higher crop N uptake) with tillage to a depth of 40 cm than to 15 or 25 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–772

Title

Tillage Depth Influence on Soil Nitrogen Distribution and Availability in a Rice Lowland

D. K. Kundu; J. K. Ladha; E. Lapitan‐de Guzman Soil Science Society of America Journal 1996. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000040028x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-b75d6f21997fc1be9a9a7a2610c422a50388b9ee3a2d6619f9cb9f266ecf2d83 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 98 positive, 10 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.