Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigated wheat had significantly higher dry matter accumulation and allocation to leaf, stem and spike than dryland wheat.

A claim from Beneficial Microbes and Phosphorus Management Influence Dry Matter Partitioning and Accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with and without Moisture Stress Condition · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated wheat had significantly higher dry matter accumulation and allocation to leaf, stem and spike than dryland wheat.

Treatment
irrigatede0
Outcome
DM accumulation and partitioning into leaf, stem and spikee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dryland wheate0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DM accumulation and partitioning into leaf, stem and spike was significantly higher in wheat under irrigated than dryland wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–722
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128

Title

Beneficial Microbes and Phosphorus Management Influence Dry Matter Partitioning and Accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with and without Moisture Stress Condition

Siddique Khan; Asim Muhammad Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology 2015. doi:10.4172/1948-5948.1000247

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2021dc1af088f9fc43fdd5dd74f02c252a26593cc58ddb8ce02c674c8714687b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.