Intervention effectmodel-written summary

RDF with 25% N through FYM gave the highest oil content (51 %) versus RDF alone.

A claim from Physiological growth, quality and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by application of sulphur with use of farmyard manure · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with 25% N through FYM gave the highest oil content (51 %) versus RDF alone.

Treatment
RDF along with 25 % N through FYMe0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
51 %e0
Comparator
RDF alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of RDF along with 25 % N through FYM recorded highest physiological growth [Leaf area index (1.86), crop growth rate (6.98 g m-2 day-1), relative growth rate (0.054 g g-1 day-1) at 45 Days after sowing], quality [oil content (51 %), oil yield (321 kg ha-1) and protein content (22.2 %)] and economics [gross returns (50480 Rs.), net returns (34470 Rs.) and B:C Ratio (3.15)] of sesame over application of RDF alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–966
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–74

Title

Physiological growth, quality and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by application of sulphur with use of farmyard manure

K. Mamatha; GE Ch. Vidya Sagar; Laxmi Narayana Pasupuleti; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-20f63955759a79920c71dfeae6d1b20a69210e758ac785183199b9b9b51b8ed1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: oil · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 27 positive, 10 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.