Intervention effectmodel-written summary

30 kg sulphur per ha gave the highest crop growth rate (8.49 g m-2 day-1) versus 10 and 20 kg per ha.

A claim from Physiological growth, quality and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by application of sulphur with use of farmyard manure · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

30 kg sulphur per ha gave the highest crop growth rate (8.49 g m-2 day-1) versus 10 and 20 kg per ha.

Treatment
30 kg sulphur ha-1e0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.49 g m-2 day-1e0
Comparator
sulphur @ 10 and 20 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among sulphur levels application of 30 kg sulphur ha-1 recorded highest physiological growth [Leaf area index (1.89), crop growth rate (8.49 g m-2 day-1), relative growth rate (0.051 g g-1 day-1)], quality [oil content (51%), oil yield (319 kg ha-1) and protein content (22.2)] and economics [gross returns (50080 Rs.), net returns (35020 Rs.) and B:C Ratio (3.32)]of sesame over application of sulphur @ 10 and 20 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1390
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–74

Title

Physiological growth, quality and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by application of sulphur with use of farmyard manure

K. Mamatha; GE Ch. Vidya Sagar; Laxmi Narayana Pasupuleti; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-9194e27ff590e64caeb21ae4a5a2dda422ef82bd4f29694c6384fdf49a7ddceb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · growth · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.