Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water stress reduced stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate in both chickpea genotypes.

A claim from Drought effect on photosynthetic activity, osmolyte accumulation and membrane integrity of two Cicer arietinum genotypes · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate in both chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
Cicer arietinumCicer arietinume1
Material
ChK 3226 and ILC 3279e1
Treatment
Water stress (S1, RWC around 55-50%; S2, RWC ≤ 40%)e2
Outcome
stomatal conductance (g s) and net photosynthetic rate (P N)e2
Direction
drastically reducede2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Drought was induced in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes (ChK 3226 and ILC 3279) differing in yield capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114
e2

“Water stress (S1, RWC around 55-50%; S2, RWC ≤ 40%) drastically reduced stomatal conductance (g s) and net photosynthetic rate (P N) in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–266

Title

Drought effect on photosynthetic activity, osmolyte accumulation and membrane integrity of two Cicer arietinum genotypes

M. C. Matos; P. S. Campos; J. A. Passarinho; et al. Photosynthetica 2010. doi:10.1007/s11099-010-0038-z

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-2189e4a44fd1b230b700085196d53d60deeb7488b164d67709734694e9c3850e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.