Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Marketable bulb yield of NPK once was 66.12 Mg ha -1, not significantly greater than CRF 50%, CRF 100% and NPK 3-split.

A claim from Evaluation of Controlled Release Fertilizer on Bulb Yield, Nutrient Content, and Storage Quality of Overwintering Intermediate-Day Onions · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable bulb yield of NPK once was 66.12 Mg ha -1, not significantly greater than CRF 50%, CRF 100% and NPK 3-split.

Taxon
OnionsAllium cepat0
Treatment
NPK oncee2
Outcome
Marketable bulb yieldse2
Direction
not significantly greatere2
Value
66.12 Mg ha -1e2
Comparator
CRF 50%, CRF 100%, and NPK 3-splite2
Setting
onion growers' fieldse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Overwintering Intermediate-Day Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–137
e1

“in onion growers' fields during the 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–437
e2

“Marketable bulb yields for NPK once and CRF 150% was 66.12 Mg ha -1 and 65.67 Mg ha -1 , respectively, on a 2-year average, which were not significantly greater than CRF 50%, CRF 100%, and NPK 3-split”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1123

Title

Evaluation of Controlled Release Fertilizer on Bulb Yield, Nutrient Content, and Storage Quality of Overwintering Intermediate-Day Onions

Jongtae Lee; Byeonggyu Min Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 2022. doi:10.7745/kjssf.2022.55.4.324

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2284fc51132bc6e3f84b69ca9e533f21b8819c7f299d3a6c7163c1568930acc3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 53 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.