Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed management improved height, yield indices, grain yield and economic outcomes over weedy check.

A claim from Effect of Planting Pattern, Fertilizer Levels and Weed Management Practices on System Productivity and Economics of Pigeonpea-Based Intercropping System · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management improved height, yield indices, grain yield and economic outcomes over weedy check.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Weed management practicese0
Outcome
plant height, yield indices, grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management practices recorded significantly higher plant height, yield indices, grain yield, net return and B:C ratio than weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1439
t0

“Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–125

Title

Effect of Planting Pattern, Fertilizer Levels and Weed Management Practices on System Productivity and Economics of Pigeonpea-Based Intercropping System

Kavita Solanki; I. B. Pandey; Mukesh Kumar; et al. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2023. doi:10.9734/jeai/2023/v45i112234

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-23710196eec79acd9ca2ba6ca3a8ba77709372164cb96da9fc622f7129fc44e6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.