Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FZM spraying produced the highest leaf nutrient concentrations.

A claim from EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND NUTRIENTS UPTAKE OF MAIZE IN CALCAREOUS SOILS · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FZM spraying produced the highest leaf nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Spraying FZMe0
Outcome
nutrients concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying FZM recorded the highest nutrients concentrations and uptake in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1230
t0

“EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND NUTRIENTS UPTAKE OF MAIZE IN CALCAREOUS SOILS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137

Title

EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID AND MICRONUTRIENTS FOLIAR FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND NUTRIENTS UPTAKE OF MAIZE IN CALCAREOUS SOILS

Maha Balbaa; A. Awad Journal of Plant Production 2013. doi:10.21608/jpp.2013.73071

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-2425e90672abdfecb18fc647902d9e3911e160080724343bcde008353fc586a6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.