Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No-till field corn took up significantly more phosphorus than ripped or plowed plots.

A claim from Effects of Phosphorus on No-Till, Minimum-Till, and Conventional Till Irrigated Field Corn · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till field corn took up significantly more phosphorus than ripped or plowed plots.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
no-tille3
Outcome
Phosphorus uptakee3
Direction
significantly highere3
Comparator
ripped and plowede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Phosphorus on No-Till, Minimum-Till, and Conventional Till Irrigated Field Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90
e3

“Phosphorus uptake was measured by leaf sampling and found to be significantly higher in the no-till plots compared to the ripped and plowed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1841

Title

Effects of Phosphorus on No-Till, Minimum-Till, and Conventional Till Irrigated Field Corn

McKay, John A. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) 2021. doi:10.26076/b71d-a136

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-242b3ccbc71d441d8a6e55fe296dfe16c54a979c0cb482fbf043799b6f08e9a2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.