Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T11 produced maximum micronutrient uptake; control T1 had minimum uptake.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) on micronutrient uptake and physical properties of soil · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced maximum micronutrient uptake; control T1 had minimum uptake.

Treatment
T11 (100 per cent RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
T1 (control)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum uptake was recorded in treatment T11 (100 per cent RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter), while minimum was observed under treatment T1 (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1082
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–51

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) on micronutrient uptake and physical properties of soil

Saurabh Thakur; Anil Kumar; Swapana Sepehya; et al. Environment Conservation Journal 2023. doi:10.36953/ecj.13542397

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-256ec61782001df92ab00cc5db4e99c07d4ceadacc6c0977fe37aa40c38ae5d7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.