Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulphur significantly increased N, P and S uptake.

A claim from Influence of sulphur, phosphorus and farmyard manure on yield attributes and yield of maize (Zea mays) in southern Rajasthan conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur significantly increased N, P and S uptake.

Treatment
sulphur applicatione0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
N, P, S and Fe uptakee0t0e1e2e3
Direction
in- creasede0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P, S and Fe uptake by seed stover and total uptake by maize in- creased significantly as a result of sulphur application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–501
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102
e1

“Cobslplant, rowslcob, cob weight, grain weight1 cob, seed index, seed and stover yields, N, P, S and Fe uptake by seed stover and total uptake by maize in- creased significantly as a result of sulphur application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–501
e2

“Application of 40 kg phosphorus increased significantly the yield attributes and seed and stover yields over 20 kg P,O,/ha, repre- senting a mean increases of 13.6 and 12.5% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–839
e3

“Application of 10 tonnes FYMIha enhanced signifi- cantly the yield attributes and yield over no farmyard manure to the magnitude of 13.9 in seed and 11.2% in sto- ver yield, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–1027

Title

Influence of sulphur, phosphorus and farmyard manure on yield attributes and yield of maize (Zea mays) in southern Rajasthan conditions

Y.K. MEHTA; M.S. SHAKTAWAT; S.M. SlNGHl Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v50i3.5106

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-25842e810238dcf51d368cf01e3047b21cd9d3ddfcbba059c05596ad4944c2da · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.