Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment produced the greatest net return.

A claim from Nutrient management approach to improve productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in north east hill zones of India · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment produced the greatest net return.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
vermicompost @5 t/ha and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria @30 kg/hae1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
greateste0
Value
80.43 × 103 ₹/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest net return (80.43 × 103 ₹/ha) in the mentioned treatment also proves its economic viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1729
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83
e1

“applying vermicompost @5 t/ha and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria @30 kg/ha markedly increased number of nodules (17.38)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1345

Title

Nutrient management approach to improve productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in north east hill zones of India

SARMISTHA SARKAR; BIMAN DE; PARTHA DAS; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.56093/ijas.v95i4.151803

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-289d656dca3f6e1eff1a3cce85808067cfde474e4f4f0077577f1ccfd5759169 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Phosphorus at 40 and 80 kg P2O5/ha did not significantly affect crop yields.

    Effect of phosphorus and bio-fertilizer on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus Cajan) + mungbean (Phaseolus Radiatus) intercropping system · 2013

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

    Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Cajanus cajan showed no field yield response to phosphorus.

    The response of Bambara groundnut (Voandzeia subterranea) and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) to applications of lime, P and K · 1984

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Sulphur and phosphorus treatment increased grain yield to 14.81 q ha(-1), 102.77% over control.

    Effect of sulphur and phosphorus on yield, quality and nutrient status of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). · 2010 · compared with control

    Same direction

  5. positive
    PSB seed inoculation significantly raised component-crop and pigeon pea-equivalent yields.

    Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Pigeon Pea-based Intercropping System and Soil Properties in Mollisols of the Tarai Region · 2012 · compared with un-inoculated seeds

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The 40 kg N + 40 kg P2O5/ha treatment gave significantly higher yield attributes than control.

    Nitrogen use efficiency, economic return and yield performance of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] as influenced by nipping and fertility levels · 2019 · compared with control

    Same direction

  7. positive
    N+P increased pigeon pea yield by 112%.

    Iron deficiency depresses growth of furrow irrigated soybean and pigeon pea on vertisols of northern N.S.W · 1992

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combined Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR inoculation outyielded control and single inoculants.

    Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea under different sources of nutrients in rainfed condition of Central India · 2010 · compared with control, Rhizobium and PSB alone

    Same direction

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    In the greenhouse, inoculation with Rhizobium had no effect on yields or N2 fixing characteristics of pigeon pea.

    Effects of Phosphorus, Calcium, and Hup− and Hup+ Rhizobia on Pigeon Pea Yields in an Infertile Tropical Soil1 · 1985

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Seed yield of AL 882 was reduced by 26.61 per cent in lac inoculated plants compared with un-inoculated plants.

    Cultivation of Lac Insect Kerria lacca (Kerr.) (Katki Strain) in Punjab: Impact on Host Plant Cajanus cajan · 2024 · compared with un-inoculated plants

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Bacterial inoculation increased pod number and pod weight in both crops in the field.

    Plant growth-promotion and biofortification of chickpea and pigeonpea through inoculation of biocontrol potential bacteria, isolated from organic soils · 2016 · compared with un-inoculated control plots

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Dual AMF and PGPR inoculation increased pigeon pea grain yield more effectively than single inoculation.

    Intercropping Transplanted Pigeon Pea With Finger Millet: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Boost Yield While Reducing Fertilizer Input · 2020 · compared with single inoculation

    Same direction

  5. positive
    PSB seed inoculation significantly raised component-crop and pigeon pea-equivalent yields.

    Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Pigeon Pea-based Intercropping System and Soil Properties in Mollisols of the Tarai Region · 2012 · compared with un-inoculated seeds

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Rhizobium plus PSB produced higher net returns of Rs. 17953 and 20,901.

    Effect of phosphorus and bio-fertilizer on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus Cajan) + mungbean (Phaseolus Radiatus) intercropping system · 2013

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Combined Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR inoculation outyielded control and single inoculants.

    Productivity and profitability of pigeonpea under different sources of nutrients in rainfed condition of Central India · 2010 · compared with control, Rhizobium and PSB alone

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combined Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR inoculation increased pigeonpea seed yield over control and Rhizobium plus PSB to 1192 kg/ha.

    Performance of pigeonpea under different sources of nutrients in rainfed conditions of Karnataka · 2015 · compared with both control and Rhizobium + PSB

    Same direction

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

    Comparison of N2 Fixation and Yields in Cajanus cajan between Hydrogenase-Positive and Hydrogenase-Negative Rhizobia by In Situ Acetylene Reduction Assays and Direct 15N Partitioning · 1983

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Vermicompost and phosphocompost gave identical growth and yield outcomes.

    Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties to organic manures and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil · 2006 · compared with phosphoeompost

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments had no effect on green pod yield.

    Influence of Fertility Level on the Protein Content and Agronomic Characters of Pigeonpeas in an Oxisol · 1971

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

    Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Growth regulators and foliar fertilizer had no effect on pod set or final pod number.

    Influence of Nutrition and Bioregulators on Flower Retention, Pod Set and Yield on Pigeon Peas (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Huth) · 1981

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Organic fertilizer had no effect on Cajanus cajan productivity compared with the control

    Effect of Cow Dung as Organic Manure on the Productivity of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp (Pigeon pea) · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Increasing fertilizer did not significantly increase equivalent yield in pigeonpea plus urdbean.

    Production Potential and Economic Feasibility of Planting Pattern and Nutrient Management in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Based Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fertilizer improved pigeon pea yields by 32–449% compared with unfertilized intercrops.

    Sustainable Intensification with Cereal-Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa · 2019 · compared with unfertilized intercrops

    Same direction

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.