Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T12 produced the maximum net return (156075 Rs/ha).

A claim from Effect of Nitrogen Scheduling on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 produced the maximum net return (156075 Rs/ha).

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
T12 : 1/3 at basal +1/3 at CRI (21-25 DAS) + 1/3 at Jointing stage (65-70 DAS) + 2.0% urea + 0.5% ZnSO4 spray at flag leaf stage (80-90 DAS)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
156075 Rs/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data recorded maximum growth attributes like, plant height (94.45 cm), dry matter accum8lation per m row length (248.78 g) and yield attributes such as number of effective tillers per m row length (65.40), number of grains per spike (82.24), grain yield (5230 kg/ha), stover yield (6634 kg/ha), biological yield (11864 kg/ha) and maximum net return (156075 Rs/ha) was recorded with T12 : 1/3 at basal +1/3 at CRI (21-25 DAS) + 1/3 at Jointing stage (65-70 DAS) + 2.0% urea + 0.5% ZnSO4 spray at flag leaf stage (80-90 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–1018
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–81

Title

Effect of Nitrogen Scheduling on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Rohan Sharma; Bhagwan Suman; Om Prakash Gurjar; et al. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture 2024. doi:10.9734/arja/2024/v17i4602

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2908fcdde7cbedfe5090289fe4ce6bc621815cc5b83ef5eb15e6fd90573025ca · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Nutri priming of seeds with zinc sulphate heptahydrate solution could not improve wheat yield over control.

    Yield and grain zinc concentration of wheat as affected by nutri priming and foliar application of zinc · 2019 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Grain yields in insecticide-only and insecticide plus zinc plots were statistically similar.

    Compatibility of foliar application of zinc sulphate with insecticides against wheat aphid · 2021 · compared with thiamethoxam and azadirachtin sprayed plots

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Soil or foliar application of FeSO4 and ZnSO4, alone or combined, increased plant height, tiller number and spike length of wheat.

    Biofortification with Zinc and Iron Improves the Grain Quality and Yield of Wheat Crop · 2020

    Same direction

  4. positive
    The greatest grain number per spike followed 80 kg ZnSO4 ha−1 plus foliar Mn.

    Response of Wheat Plants to Zinc, Iron, and Manganese Applications and Uptake and Concentration of Zinc, Iron, and Manganese in Wheat Grains · 2009

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The combined FeSO4, ZnSO4, and MnSO4 spray was comparatively better for wheat yield attributes.

    Foliar Application of Micronutrients Enhances Wheat Growth, Yield and Related Attributes · 2015 · compared with comparatively

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Seed-banded zinc sulfate gave the highest grain yields.

    Effectiveness of zinc sulfate and zinc chelate as foliar sprays in alleviating zinc deficiency of wheat grown on zinc-deficient soils in Western Australia · 1991

    Same direction

  7. positive
    ZnSO 4 priming increased plant dry matter and grain yield over unprimed seeds.

    Effect of seed priming on growth and phenology of wheat under late‐sown conditions · 2004 · compared with unprimed seeds

    Same direction

  8. positive
    ZnSO4 spraying gave the highest grain yield in both genotypes.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021

    Same direction

91 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    The split nitrogen schedule increased grain yield 4.14% over the recommended schedule.

    Impact of nitrogen application on the performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and nitrogen use efficiency under different dates of sowing · 2001 · compared with recom- 4 mended (F ) schedule

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Foliar N applications showed no consistent increase or decrease in grain yield, straw yield or straw N.

    Influence of Late‐Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Yield and Grain Nitrogen in Winter Wheat · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Boot-stage foliar N significantly reduced grain yield of hard red spring wheat by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    One and two fungicide sprays did not differ significantly in increasing wheat grain yield.

    Reduction of Winter Wheat Yield Losses Caused by Stripe Rust through Fungicide Management · 2016 · compared with One

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Boot stage foliar nitrogen reduced spring wheat grain yield by 5%.

    Foliar Nitrogen Application Timing Influence on Grain Yield and Protein Concentration of Hard Red Winter and Spring Wheat · 2003

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nano-N plus nano-Zn with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Wheat grain yield was highest at 240 kg N ha−1 applied through vegetative growth stages, at 8230 kg ha-1.

    Wheat yield and grain protein response to nitrogen amount and timing. · 2011

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    The lowest N rates reduced grain number per square metre at any given photothermal quotient.

    The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Severe drought with low nitrogen reduced grain yields.

    Nitrogen Nutrition Improves the Potential of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Alleviate the Effects of Drought Stress during Vegetative Growth Periods · 2016

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Low nitrogen reduced grain yield to 4.3 t/ha.

    The Effects of Prolonged Drought and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root and Shoot Growth and Water Uptake by Winter Wheat · 1989 · compared with both N and water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Terminal spikelet production was delayed by about 2 d at these N treatments in Aroona.

    Leaf Emergence, Tiller Growth, and Apical Development of Nitrogen‐Dificient Spring Wheat · 1993

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nitrogen level, N timing and seeding rate had no significant effect on spring wheat grain yield across environments.

    Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Management Effects on Spring Wheat Yield and Yield Components · 2007

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    ear weight changed with two nitrogen treatments.

    Effect of source‐sink relations and nitrogen nutrition on senescence and N remobilization in the flag leaf of wheat · 1991

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    In some environments, higher nitrogen rates lowered wheat yield.

    Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield · 2004

    Opposite direction

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.