Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AWD had 14.16 productive tillers per hill, higher than critical-stage irrigation.

A claim from Influence of different establishment methods and irrigation management practices on morphological and yield parameters in rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD had 14.16 productive tillers per hill, higher than critical-stage irrigation.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae0
Treatment
Alternate wetting dryinge1
Outcome
no. of productive tillers per hille1
Direction
lowere1
Value
14.16e1
Comparator
critical stage irrigation approache1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–189
e1

“Alternate wetting drying was found more significant on no. of productive tillers per hill (14.16), Panicle length (22.62 cm), test weight (23.81g), no. of grains per panicle (150.67), grain yield (4985.70 kg ha-1) and straw yield of rice (5488.56 kg ha-1), while lower values were recorded with critical stage irrigation approach at harvesting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1837

Title

Influence of different establishment methods and irrigation management practices on morphological and yield parameters in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

S.A. Veeresh; A Amaregouda; M. R. Umesh; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-294ffec62e4e7bedbb19ae4571f6be3ab3ee6372e6a00f28a798eed773ebe1db · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.