Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fibre length increased by 0.3 cm.

A claim from Effect of the Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre length increased by 0.3 cm.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
length of fibree0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
0.3cme0t0e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the length of fibre increased by 0.3cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–511
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120

Title

Effect of the Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton

Shuang-Feng Zhang Hubei nongye kexue 2006

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2a70bfae87349d760535dba2a50d19d7202671c6415c4504a444835a8de816e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

insecticide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
    Lint yield did not differ significantly among the insecticide PGR treatments in cotton.

    Evaluation of PGR properties of TRIMAX in cotton · 2005 · compared with among any of the insecticide PGR treatments

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.