Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculated and sprayed cowpea had significantly enhanced pod dry weight at harvest versus controls.

A claim from Contribution of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), Rhizobia and Metarhizium anisopliae to Cowpea Production in Cameroon · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated and sprayed cowpea had significantly enhanced pod dry weight at harvest versus controls.

Treatment
Inoculated and sprayed treatmentse0
Outcome
dry weight of pods per plante0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
at harveste0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated and sprayed treatments significantly produced more pods per plant (p<0.01) and enhanced the dry weight of pods per plant at harvest (p = 0.03) in all trials compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1647
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–97

Title

Contribution of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF), Rhizobia and Metarhizium anisopliae to Cowpea Production in Cameroon

A. Ngakou; D. Nwaga; N.N. Ntonifor; et al. International Journal of Agricultural Research 2007. doi:10.3923/ijar.2007.754.764

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2b0eab6372b7d09b8a549fff619f77fe36792fac1d5cfcd9e90bd01e53413e99 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

117 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.