Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar urea at flowering and pod formation gave the highest number of nodules and nodule dry weight compared with control.

A claim from Effect of foliar-applied urea on symbiotic parameters, yield and monetary returns of irrigated chickpea · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea at flowering and pod formation gave the highest number of nodules and nodule dry weight compared with control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Application of 2% urea at flowering and pod formation stagese2
Outcome
number of nodules, dry weight of nodulese2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of foliar-applied urea on symbiotic parameters, yield and monetary returns of irrigated chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–103
e2

“Application of 2% urea at flowering and pod formation stages recorded the highest number of nodules, dry weight of nodules, plant height and yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–590
e1

“control (no application) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–431

Title

Effect of foliar-applied urea on symbiotic parameters, yield and monetary returns of irrigated chickpea

Guriqbal Singh; Harjeet S. Brar; Harpreet K. Virk; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2022. doi:10.1080/01904167.2022.2093745

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2b7689a5a1de4c003bce4022e72da2cc85c4a18f115ecd6098a09cd1d2d3ecdc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

stage · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.