Paper · 1998 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

THE EFFECTS OF INOCULATION AND DIFFERENT DOSES OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

Nazmiye Meral; Cemalettin Yaşar Çiftçi; Saime Ünver

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research was conducted at Applying and Research Farm, Faculty of Agriculture. University of Ankara in 1995. The aim of this research was to determine the effects of inoculation and different doses of nitrogen fertilizer on the characters of plant height, plant weight, number of nodule on plant and nodule weight, root weight, seed weight, harvest index, 100 seed weight and yield per decare. The variety of chickpea named Akçin-91 was used as seed material. Rhizobium ciceri was used as inoculant. The sowing was done at split randomized block design and in three replication.According to the results of this research; nodulation has not been occurred in the applications in which bacterium inoculation was not done, depending on this, the lowest values have been obtained in root weight, plant height, plant weight, number of pods per plant, seed weight and yield. In the application of seed inoculation, the nodules were bigger and they occured near by mean root and also the root weight had increased. The similar results have been determined in plant height, plant weight. number of pods, seed weight and yield with the method of soil inoculation. In the application of soil inoculation, the number of nodules were the highest, but nodules were small and occured around capillary roots. Plant characteristics investigated have shown similar results to methods of seed inoculation and soil inoculation. In the application of nitrogen; nodulation decreased in inoculation application, but it caused significant increases in other characteristics. Both bacterium inoculation applications and nitrogen doses have caused important increase in yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without bacterial inoculation, chickpea did not form nodules.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
bacterium inoculation was not donee0
Outcome
nodulation has not been occurrede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nodulation has not been occurred in the applications in which bacterium inoculation was not done”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without bacterial inoculation, chickpea had the lowest root weight, plant height, plant weight, pod number, seed weight and yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
bacterium inoculation was not donee1
Outcome
root weight, plant height, plant weight, number of pods per plant, seed weight and yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest values have been obtained in root weight, plant height, plant weight, number of pods per plant, seed weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterium inoculation was not done, depending on this”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation produced larger nodules near the main root and increased root weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed inoculatione0
Outcome
nodulese0
Direction
biggere0
Qualifier
near by mean roote0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the application of seed inoculation, the nodules were bigger and they occured near by mean root and also the root weight had increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation increased chickpea root weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed inoculatione1
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root weight had increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the application of seed inoculation, the nodules were bigger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inoculation produced the highest number of small nodules around capillary roots.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
soil inoculatione0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
small and occured around capillary rootse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the application of soil inoculation, the number of nodules were the highest, but nodules were small and occured around capillary roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application decreased nodulation in inoculated chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the application of nitrogen; nodulation decreased in inoculation application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen significantly increased other investigated chickpea characteristics.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogene1
Outcome
other characteristicse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but it caused significant increases in other characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the application of nitrogen; nodulation decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation and nitrogen doses increased chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
bacterium inoculation applications and nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both bacterium inoculation applications and nitrogen doses have caused important increase in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 110 positive, 4 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 135 positive, 17 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.