Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Black mulch with drip irrigation at 0.6 PE inhibited weeds through tomato growth.

A claim from Influence of different mulches and irrigation levels on water use efficiency, weed biomass and productivity of drip irrigated tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black mulch with drip irrigation at 0.6 PE inhibited weeds through tomato growth.

Treatment
black polythene mulch with drip irrigation at 0.6 PEe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of silver black polythene mulch or black polythene mulch with drip irrigation at 0.6 PE inhibited weed growth throughout growing period of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1137

Title

Influence of different mulches and irrigation levels on water use efficiency, weed biomass and productivity of drip irrigated tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)

SV Pimpale; AS Kadale; GD Gadade; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2021. doi:10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1au.11757

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2c6eb079f99c82a4f7a3f92dc89e13fa97a61707d9c3e9abe01ef7f5621076d8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

poly(ethylene) · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 49 positive, 6 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

irrigation · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.