Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 PE with silver black mulch gave higher tomato fruit yield than other combinations, comparable with I2M1 and I1M2.

A claim from Influence of different mulches and irrigation levels on water use efficiency, weed biomass and productivity of drip irrigated tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 PE with silver black mulch gave higher tomato fruit yield than other combinations, comparable with I2M1 and I1M2.

Treatment
drip irrigation level at 0.8 PE with silver black polythene mulche0
Outcome
fruit yield of tomatoe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
comparable with treatment combination of irrigation level at 0.8 PE with black polythene mulch (I2M1) and irrigation level at 0.6 PE with silver black polythene mulch (I1M2)e0
Comparator
rest of the treatment combinatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of drip irrigation level at 0.8 PE with silver black polythene mulch (I2M2) recorded higher yield attributes along with higher fruit yield of tomato over rest of the treatment combination, however it was comparable with treatment combination of irrigation level at 0.8 PE with black polythene mulch (I2M1) and irrigation level at 0.6 PE with silver black polythene mulch (I1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1542

Title

Influence of different mulches and irrigation levels on water use efficiency, weed biomass and productivity of drip irrigated tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)

SV Pimpale; AS Kadale; GD Gadade; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2021. doi:10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1au.11757

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-3de07655eb0ea7eec4f6f66a7922020528b5f6788884f39a60040e3108ea0fba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

silver atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

poly(ethylene) · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mulching · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

210 papers: 184 positive, 26 negative or no effect

183 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

201 papers more in this group

See all 210 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.